Towards and Epistemology of Understanding: Rethinking Justification

Conference at the University of Berne,  March 21-22, 2014

Our epistemic endeavours do not only aim at knowledge and rational belief. We also want to understand what we believe. We search for explanations of facts we know and for theories which organize our knowledge. But what indicates whether an explanation is appropriate or whether a theory really advances our understanding? These questions bring justification to the fore, an aspect of understanding which has hardly been addressed so far. In epistemology, where understanding has become a hot topic, epistemic justification is intensively discussed, but not with respect to explanations and theories. In philosophy of science, explanations and theories are widely debated, but rarely with respect to understanding.

The aim of this conference is to bring together the debates in epistemology and in philosophy of science to clarify the question what justification in connection with understanding means. More specifically, the conference will explore how this question can be addressed by exploiting, on the one hand, well-known epistemological positions, such as internalism and theories that refer to coherence, abilities or character traits; and, on the other hand, by making use of insights from philosophy of science which help to clarify the structure of explanations and theories as well as the plurality of epistemic values.

Programm

Friday

Kareem Khalifa (Middleburry), Must Understanding Be Coherent?
Comment: Claus Beisbart (Bern)

Victor Gijsbers (Leiden), Coherentism and Uni fication
Comment: Nicolas Wuthrich (London)

Christoph Baumberger (Zurich) & Georg Brun (Zurich), Justifying Understanding by Reflective Equilibrium
Comment: Jorg Loschke (Bern)

Catherine Elgin (Harvard), Exempli cation and Understanding
Comment: Ursula Renz (Klagenfurt/Konstanz)

Saturday

Henk de Regt (Amsterdam), Facts, Fictions and Scienti c Understanding
Comment: Kathrin Honig (St. Gallen/Konstanz)

Sabine Ammon (Cottbus/Darmstadt), Understanding: Probing Procedural Epistemology
Comment: Christian Budnik (Bern)

Stephen Grimm (Fordham), Understanding and Transparency
Comment: Christoph Baumberger (Zurich)

John Greco (Saint Louis), Satisfying Understanding
Comment: Pedro Schmechtig (Dresden)

Christoph Kelp (Leuven), Understanding, Knowledge and Ability
Comment: Anna Maria Eder (Munchen/Konstanz)

Organized by:

Christoph Baumberger (Zurich)
Georg Brun (Berne)
Sabine Ammon (Darmstadt)
Claus Beisbart (Berne)